Many years ago, I saw an ad in a Christian publication promoting a product I found offensive. A certain televangelist was inviting churches to buy satellite equipment so they could beam the messages from his church into their worship services. The idea behind the ad was that if a church really wanted to grow, then its people needed to listen to this single gifted man.
The ad outraged me. This televangelist came from the South, while our church was in the West. He came from a charismatic church, while ours was non-charismatic. He often used a condemning tone, while I tried to speak with grace. He did not know our people, but I did. And he was not a biblical expositor, while that’s what I loved doing most.
How dare he presume that every church in America needed to hear him preach every week rather than their own pastor!
I hope that few churches signed up for this offer. Not long after that ad came out, that televangelist engaged in some extracurricular activities that resulted in the satellite dishes being turned off – for good.
While that was an extreme case, the Christian world seems to be increasingly listening to fewer and fewer biblical teachers.
Many churches now have only one teacher in the entire congregation: the pastor. Since most churches don’t offer adult classes or Sunday evening services or midweek worship anymore, the pastor becomes the lone communicator of biblical truth by default – or design.
Even if a church has small groups, leaders are usually instructed to facilitate discussion rather than teach in any meaningful way. And increasingly, that discussion is about the pastor’s message from the week before. So even gifted teachers who lead such groups aren’t supposed to teach anything but let everyone talk.
There are pros and cons to this new approach.
For starters, it helps some preachers lead a more balanced life. I once knew the pastor of a megachurch who told me he studied 50 hours every week. (You read that right.) He studied 15 hours for the Sunday morning service, 15 hours for the Sunday evening service, and 20 hours for the Wednesday night prayer meeting.
Why so long for the Wednesday night service? Because he never knew who might show up to hear him, and he wanted to be accurate in his teaching. (John MacArthur showed up a few times unannounced.)
Forgive me, but that’s insane, if not self-destructive. In fact, that pastor died less than two years after he shared that information with me. Since studying is a sedentary habit, the lack of bodily movement may have done him in.
So that’s one extreme: the pastor is the primary teacher in the church and teaches all the time except when he’s on vacation.
We now have another extreme which I believe is much more healthy: the pastor shares the teaching role with several other gifted communicators. Each teacher may teach for an entire series and then take the next one or two off, or each teacher might be assigned a different Sunday during the same series.
The advantages are enormous. The congregation gets to hear from several gifted teachers. The pastors have plenty of time to prepare their messages. And messages can be divided up by specialties. It can be difficult listening to the same voice all the time, but if you hear two or more voices, it’s much easier to take.
The downside, of course, is that most churches can only afford one gifted teacher, not three or four. And the more gifted someone is, the more often they want to speak.
Now a few megachurches are planting satellite churches in outlying areas and sending a live feed of the message from the mother church into those venues. The church we’ve been attending for the past year plans to do this all over the Phoenix area and has already started a satellite campus in the area where we used to live.
When they did this, they absorbed another megachurch. The pastor from the megachurch now teaches periodically at the mother megachurch. While he now speaks to more people, he also speaks less often.
It seems to me that technology is leading to a social Darwinism in the Christian community. For example, what would happen in your church if Rick Warren or Mark Driscoll decided to open up a satellite campus in your area? Would people from your church flock to the satellite campus and desert your church and pastor? (By the way, I know an area where both Warren and Driscoll are planning on opening satellite campuses.)
Is this about reaching more people, trying to amass the most followers, increasing revenue streams, or all of the above?
Sometimes it feels like there are only going to be ten preachers left in the entire US: Warren, Hybels, Driscoll, Lucado, Osteen, both Stanleys, Piper, Beth Moore, and a few others. There will be Warren churches, Lucado churches, and Piper churches. The music will be different in each locale, but instead of being known by denominational labels or movements, a church will be known by the name of the teacher it beams in on satellite.
Isn’t there a biblical prophecy about this phenomenon somewhere? Does Harold Camping have any insight about this?
I have five concerns about this particular trend:
First, what happens when a popular teacher veers off course theologically? If thousands of people have to choose between the teachings of Paul the apostle or their favorite Christian communicator, who will they choose? There is a Gen X preacher who is clearly off the rails theologically, and I know someone who thinks he’s great. How much effort should I expend in trying to convince him otherwise?
Second, what happens if a famous teacher falls morally? Twenty years ago, some of America’s best-known Christian leaders were involved in sexual scandals. It was a hard time to be the pastor of any church. I remember one woman (who did not attend our church) who kept calling and implying that all these guys were crooks. Although there have been fewer scandals in recent years (thank God!), when we farm out our teaching to a chosen few, those teachers seem to represent all of Christianity to many people. And if a few of them go down, it impacts all of us.
Third, what happens to smaller and medium-sized churches? Back in the 1990s, Christian pollster George Barna predicted that the days were coming when most churches in America would be either small or large and that medium-sized churches would soon become extinct. I’m not worried about the satellite churches winning lost people to Christ. There are enough unbelievers out there for everybody. Instead, I’m concerned about believers in smaller churches who have struggled for years to make their church go and finally leave it to join a satellite church. While the jury is out on this approach, I hope we’ll see the results of surveys on this trend soon and be able to adjust accordingly.
Fourth, why are we letting a few people do all our thinking for us? I once heard a new pastor in Silicon Valley tell a group of pastors that whenever he started preparing for a message, he first read all the commentators and then added his own thoughts. My immediate response was, “Why aren’t you letting God speak directly to you first?” Like many pastors, whenever I selected a passage to preach on, I first did all my own work and then consulted with the commentators to check my conclusions.
I didn’t want to preach a message that God gave to Chuck Swindoll or Bill Hybels: I wanted to bring a message to our people that God had given me. Since many of these satellite churches hire pastors to be on premises while the megachurch pastor is speaking on satellite, how do they feel about having their teaching gifts shelved?
We need tens of thousands of pastors all over the world who don’t buy sermons from Rick Warren but who let God’s Spirit speak directly to them through His written Word.
Finally, what happens to rookie preachers? I preached my first sermon at 19 years of age in a Sunday night service at my home church. While it wasn’t very good, my church let me teach many more times because I told them I had been called by God to preach. There were a lot of venues back then for someone who was learning to preach: Sunday School classes, the Sunday evening service, the midweek service, as well as the local rescue mission.
But where does a preacher learn to teach today?
I have always believed that if someone is called by God to preach, they should preach first in front of their home church. But the larger your home church is, the less likely that is to happen.
Before I became a pastor at age 27, I had preached in a church setting about 50 times. There were a lot of things I had to learn – and a few I had to unlearn.
But with increasingly fewer opportunities, where can a young preacher learn to develop their gift?
What are you seeing? I’d love to hear your thoughts.
This trend you are talking about Jim reflects what’s going on in our culture-I call it “one-stop shopping”. Almost gone are the days when we bought our meat at the local butcher shop, our pastries at the local bakery, and banks were not inside grocery stores. No one person or retail establishment or restaurant can do everything and do it well. It may be convenient to go to Nob Hill and get everything I need, but what will the quality be like? The same goes for churches. Each one serves a different demographic, and while I appreciate Pastor Warren and what he and his wife are doing for people all over the world, there are so many gifted pastors with different callings. I am thinking of a church in San Leandro whose calling is to serve the local homeless people. If everyone flocked to a megachurch satelite location, what would happen to those people?
LikeLike
I believe that your observations are dead-on, Ce Ce. My concern is that gifted pastors are made to feel inferior because they don’t have the reach of some of the megachurch pastors. It’s one thing for these men to move into the culture – it’s another thing for them to move into a pastor’s own church “territory.” Thanks for reading and writing!
LikeLike