One Friday night in winter … nearly twenty years ago … the Bay Area church I was pastoring advertised that we were going to have snow for the kiddies.
Since it never snowed in our area, the snow had to be imported on a truck.
My wife … who ordered the snow and was coordinating the event … was anxious. She promised snow at 7:30 pm, but the truck got lost.
Finally, the driver found his way to our campus … almost an hour late.
A man from our church … who was in his eighties … was present that night and put things into perspective when he said, “Pastor, a good church is hard to find.”
Amen to that!
Until I was 56 years old, I never had to search for a church:
*During my childhood, my dad was a pastor, so I went to the churches he served, mostly in Orange County.
*For the next eight years, I attended where my family attended.
*From ages 19 through 27, I was a staff member in three churches.
*After that, I served as the solo or senior pastor of three churches.
So for most of my life, I didn’t have to search for a church home … but that all changed after we left our last church in 2009.
While living in Arizona, it took my wife and me a long six months to find a church home.
But when we moved to the Inland Empire in Southern California six years ago, finding a church home became a complicated and painful experience.
We’ve had three church homes over the past five-and-a-half years: a Baptist church, a Calvary Chapel, and a Reformed Church.
We left the Baptist church because it was too far away to become socially involved … and because they were much too ingrown.
We left the Calvary Chapel because their worship time was becoming weirder.
We left the Reformed Church because, while they didn’t do much that was wrong, they didn’t do much that was right, either.
So now … once again … my wife and I are searching for a church home.
What are we looking for in a home church?
Five things:
First, we want to hear a biblically based, intelligent sermon.
Most pastors in our area offer a sermon based in Scripture. That’s the easy part.
But most pastors don’t offer a sermon with much, if any, intelligence.
As a former pastor, I want a pastor to:
*Give us evidence that you’ve immersed yourself in the text.
*Show us that the passage under study has passed through and touched you.
*Share with us a quote … a story … an application that is fresh and moving.
Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones … one of the greatest preachers of the twentieth century … sometimes visited churches in America. Pastors would get up to preach and be astounded to see the good doctor sitting in their congregation.
Lloyd-Jones said he looked for one primary thing in a sermon: evidence of the presence of God.
I’ve tried to apply that standard to the sermons I’ve heard, but I don’t always succeed.
Lloyd-Jones also summed up what a great sermon is in three words: “Logic on fire!”
I hear fire sometimes in the churches we visit. Sadly, I don’t hear much logic.
On Sunday, April 1, my daughter and I attended an Easter service at All Souls Church in London, England, where John Stott had been the pastor years before.
The Minister of Evangelism gave the sermon that morning, and knocked it out of the park.
There was logic … and there was fire.
I loved it.
My longtime friend Dave Rolph preaches live on Roku every Sunday morning from his Orange County church. (He’s also on the radio here in SoCal.) I watch Dave’s sermon most Sunday mornings because while he’s thoroughly biblical, he’s also original, thinks broadly, and offers stories and applications that make me think.
With most sermons I hear, I forget them as soon as I hear them. With Dave, his insights sometimes stay with me for days.
Second, we want the worship music to be singable and meaningful.
By singable, I mean that the band on stage isn’t playing too loud. You can hear the people around you singing … not just the music … and you don’t have to strain to sing yourself.
By meaningful, I mean the songs are not selected because they’re currently popular, but because they say something significant about the Lord. The words are both theologically accurate and touching.
Many churches in our area offer music that’s too loud for singing. You can hear the band and singers on stage, but you can’t hear anyone around you.
And so many of the song lyrics are repetitious. I refuse to sing the same words over and over for no reason.
The trend in many churches is to sing the same song for eight to ten minutes … like what you’ll hear at a Chris Tomlin concert.
That may work for some people, but it doesn’t work for me. What is the point of singing the same words five and seven and nine times?
My son attends a Calvary Chapel that uses acoustic music. You can hear the voices around you. I enjoy their worship times.
My daughter attends a Reformed church that also uses acoustic music. The words to the songs are elegant and deeply moving.
I’d attend either church in a heartbeat … but my son’s church is 60 miles away, and my daughter’s church is 500 miles away.
I’m sure there are churches out there that offer what we’re looking for. I just don’t know where they are.
Third, we want to meet people who are in our socioeconomic background.
This is a big problem for us around here.
I grew up in suburban Anaheim, California. Every church I pastored was located in a suburban area as well.
I don’t fit in an urban environment, and I don’t fit in a rural environment, either.
My wife and I spent 27 years ministering in the San Francisco Bay Area. We fit best with the people in that region. They are “our people.”
But we don’t live there … we live in the Inland Empire … and much of our community is rural … along with the communities ten miles north, west, and east of us.
This is really tough for us. We don’t want to come off as snobs. We aren’t better than the people around here … we’re just different.
There are churches around here where most of the people have tattoos or piercings. Praise God that those people know the Lord … but it makes us feel very uncomfortable.
You can’t determine a “relational fit” from a church website. You have to visit the church first.
And this is a major reason why we visit most churches only once.
Fourth, we want to be theologically compatible with the church’s faith and practice.
Two Sundays ago, my wife and I visited a church 15 miles south of us.
There was nothing on the church website that indicated the kind of church they were.
After a couple of worship songs, I turned to my wife and said, “This is a charismatic church.”
Now there is nothing wrong per se with a charismatic church … it’s just not our preference.
The pastor’s son spoke that morning … at a supersonic rate. He spoke on the Lord’s appointing and anointing.
My wife wanted to walk out after a few minutes. He was making us both highly anxious by his rapid-fire delivery.
I told her later that in some churches, when a pastor speaks fast, that’s an indication that he is anointed with the Holy Spirit.
After the sermon, the pastor asked everyone in the congregation to pray to receive Christ. Everyone!
That, my friends, is manipulation, pure and simple … and I refuse to attend any church that uses manipulation.
We attended another church for a few months where a woman was on the staff. That was okay.
But one Sunday, we came to church, and she delivered the sermon.
For us, that was not okay.
Churches aren’t going to tell you their peculiarities on their website. You have to visit them first.
If you visit them a few times, they won’t hide their unique beliefs or practices very long.
And then you can decide if you want to stay or not.
Finally, we want to be able to use our spiritual gifts in service.
My top spiritual gift is teaching.
My wife’s passion is outreach.
I have tried to find a church that will let me use my teaching gift, but I keep hearing the same thing: the pastor is our only teacher.
And if the pastor shares his pulpit, he shares it with staff … or a visiting missionary … or an old pastor friend.
I’m not angling to preach. I just want to teach God’s Word to God’s people.
In our community, my guess is that less than 10% of the churches even offer Sunday School or adult Bible classes.
And I don’t know where those churches are.
Instead, the churches offer small groups, which is good … but the whole idea of groups is that everyone participates … and no one teaches.
I suppose I could volunteer to clean toilets … or move chairs … or work in the nursery … or fill a slot somewhere.
Forgive me, but no thanks.
Since I can’t use my gifts inside a church, I write instead.
_______________
A couple weeks ago, my wife spent several hours looking for a church for us to visit.
She checked out dozens of websites … and only found a handful of churches that might appeal to us.
When I checked out the churches, I eliminated most of them for the reasons listed above.
I’ve decided to make a chart and rank the churches in priority order.
But my big concern is that we aren’t going to find a church where we fit.
Yes, we’ve visited several churches, and gone back two or three or more times … hoping that would become our church home.
But it just hasn’t worked out.
We’re not looking for a perfect church … just one where we fit.
There are many such churches in the Bay Area … and in Orange County.
There aren’t that many in the Inland Empire.
That older gentleman was right:
A good church is indeed hard to find.
Jim,
Very pointed. Just the fact that a good church is hard to find is very telling how a lazy mindset within the culture has infiltrated what should be a societal stronghold. But this is nothing new – just considerably worse in our modern entertainment oriented society.
I discovered an article with excerpts of Spurgeon’s response to Darwin’s [then] newly published Origin of Species. Spurgeon was all of 25 at the time yet had the boldness and conviction to call Darwin’s evolution a “popular delusion”, commenting, “If God’s word be true, evolution is a lie.” Nuf said….except it wasn’t (which is even more obvious 150 years later.) Spurgeon observed from his own pulpit that people were being swayed off the true Gospel by this “itching ears” falsehood, so he spoke out against it with truth. If it could happen to Spurgeon in his own church then we should not be surprised when it happens today in the modern church.
Secondary doctrinal differences operating within a church can be respectfully argued, but only as long as the primary Gospel tenets are not touched, or worse, left out altogether. Far too many churches focus on entertaining, people have to look hard to find what Christ did for them on the Cross. Spurgeon’s siren cry against popular delusions (and I would add, the loss of reason) have infiltrated too far and I think it’s time for a reset and return to basics. Certainly some churches (maybe many) have sound services without all the fluff. I’m not suggesting legalism or a staid one size fits all – far from it. But stuff like starting a service with 30 minutes of pro-level concert music that is watched but not engaged by the congregant (as you point out)…that is not worship, it’s a distraction from purposeful worship solely designed to get people into the mood, which would not be necessary with sound doctrine being taught and modeled. Understand, I have nothing against music worship teams, so many are exceptional with awesome talent brought to bear for the Lord, and many truly add to the worship experience. But they are not the star of the service, Christ is.
Culture pushes boundaries, even in the church. Foundational worship has been chipped away and eroded to the point that this leaves too many hanging in the balance instead of being grounded in God’s prescription. No matter how fun or entertaining (some is okay), a church worship time that does not challenge the participant in their faith – both personally and within the church and community – is no service at all. What is needed is strength in the pulpit.
LikeLike
Thanks for your comment, Paul. In my view, it’s a matter of communicating to our culture in a language they can understand. Certainly we Christians don’t want to just talk to ourselves, as many churches do. (I visited one recently.) Using music, video, good sound systems, and other cultural communication forms is a good and necessary thing, in my view. The more interesting and creative we get during worship, the more some will accuse a church of entertainment. But I’ve been in plenty of churches where they do the same thing every Sunday and canonize their irrelevant methodology … and those churches aren’t thriving but hanging on for dear life.
Kim and I can usually attend only two services at a “home” church every month. We go to church with our son and his family every few weeks (they live 60 miles away) and we sometimes have other plans on Sundays. (Like driving back from Phoenix last Sunday morning to visit my family.) We’ve tried and tried to find a church where we fit, but it’s really a challenge right now. But we won’t give up!
Jim
LikeLike
I used to joke I could talk about cleaning stalls and Jesus in the same message and my neighbors got it. It was basic, but relevant to where we lived. Despite the rural ranch setting I wholeheartedly agree the Christian church can and should use available tools to communicate in a relevant fashion, especially so in larger churches.
If I may [drone on further, that is]….Regardless of size or demographic it is imperative that messages speak to the person of today – striking a chord the hearer can identify and take with them to mull and apply (or at least, as you mentioned in your post, for a few days). Worship music can and should be uplifting and inspiring or contemplative to connect with folks; whether old hymns, new songs, shape note (kinda cool actually), Bluegrass Gospel (I believe Alison Krauss sings like an angel), my wife rewording My Immortal by Evanescence then singing it (brought tears to my eyes), or a dozen other genres in the mix – all judiciously using musicianship and technology…or not…to make the worship impactful with an expectant congregation…as long as the Gospel does not get lost in the process. Be serious when required but also have some fun…God loves a joyous heart.
My premise is people need to be engaged in the worship, not just watch. As with most things it’s in the balance between the worship elements and keeping them fresh that is important or else, as you said, you lose people. In short, I am agreeing with your points. So where do we find such a church? I suspect in quite a few places that meet people where they live. Here, we like corny and ordinary and some tech in our Fellowship….and we are okay with that. Now, the “other” church up the road…not so much any more. Funny how that can happen so quickly by a select few who believe they are the keepers of such things. Then again, maybe they will come back around to where we had them. Doubtful…which is a shame.
LikeLike