It’s been a while since I’ve presented an excerpt to my upcoming book, which should be published in September or October. The book is a real-life story about a group of people who joined forces to force a pastor to resign … using any and all means at their disposal.
The last chapter of the book presents FAQs on this kind of conflict. In most churches, there are churchgoers who know which perpetrators have launched an attack on their pastor … but to keep their friendship, they usually remain silent.
I’ll divide this question into two parts. Here’s the first part:
What usually happens to the perpetrators?
Realistically? Nothing. Biblically, however, perpetrators must be corrected before they strike again. This can be done by staff members, the governing board, or deputized members. However, if a transitional/interim pastor is hired after the pastor’s departure, he may have to oversee this thankless task. (Some transitional pastors are trained to deal with powerbrokers and request absolute authority before being hired.) Unrepentant individuals who target their pastor sense they are immune from correction and feel free to use the same template with the next pastor. However, in such situations:
Peace mongering is common. With tranquility and stability reigning as premium values, congregational leaders adapt to their most recalcitrant and immature people, allowing them to use threats and tantrums as levers of influence. Malcontents’ complaints never seem to cease. Unwilling to confront the constant critic, leaders set the table for the unhappy souls to have a movable feast of anxiety. By appeasing rather than opposing, leaders give control to reactive forces. Feed them once and leaders can be sure they will be back for more.[i]
As far as I know, no one took action against any non-board perpetrators in our situation. My counsel to any successor is, “Watch your back. They know the template.” Trull and Carter note:
Generally speaking, an incoming minister does not need to fear those who speak well of the predecessor. Those who loved, appreciated, respected, and supported the former minister will likely do the same with the new minister. The church member of whom the minister should be wary is the one who speaks ill of the previous minister. Those who criticize, find fault with, and express disappointment in the former minister will probably react to the new minister in the same way over time.[ii]
I have to confess, this really bothers me. For decades, pastors have been told that whenever there’s a major conflict in a church they’re leading, they need to resign to keep the church intact. But why should the pastor leave while those who initiated the conflict are permitted to stay? I suppose it’s easier to remove one person than many. And spiritually-speaking, the shepherd lays down his life for the sheep, just as Jesus did (John 10:14-15). But why don’t God’s people band together and ask the perpetrators to leave as well? If the pastor can find another church, they can find another church – and it’s much easier for them than for him. I saw the highlights of a basketball game in which both players involved in a fight were instantly removed from the game. Why doesn’t this happen in churches? Aren’t we rewarding people for their divisiveness without expecting them to change?
If I was a layman and my pastor was pushed out by non-board antagonists, I’d approach a board member and say, “If you confront those who perpetrated this conflict, I will stay in this church. But if you don’t deal with them, I will leave and find a church where they take Scripture seriously. And if anybody asks why I left, I will feel obligated to tell them.” While this may sound harsh, how can church leaders take no action against those who have driven out their minister? Steinke writes:
In congregations, boundary violators too often are given a long rope because others refuse to confront the trespassers. When boundaries are inappropriately crossed and people are harmed, no one wants to name the violation. It’s as if the disturbance of the group’s serenity is a greater offense than the viral-like behavior. Boundary violators go unattended and suffer no consequences . . . . The lack of attention only enables the repetition of the invasive behavior.[iii]
[i] Steinke, Congregational Leadership in Anxious Times, 102.
[ii] Trull and Carter, Ministerial Ethics, 129.
[iii] Steinke, Congregational Leadership in Anxious Times, 85.









































“Lord, I Don’t Want to be a Prophet!”
Posted in Church Conflict, Church Health and Conflict, Conflict with the Pastor, Fighting Evil, Pastoral Termination, Personal Stories, Please Comment!, tagged 1 Corinthians 14:1, gift of prophecy, prophets and controversy, prophets and suffering on August 22, 2012| 15 Comments »
I have a spiritual gift I wish I didn’t have.
The gift of prophecy.
I wish the Lord had given me the gift of exhortation, or giving, or healing instead. But I wasn’t consulted in the matter, because the Lord distributes the gifts as He wills (1 Cor. 12:11, 18).
I’ve taken many spiritual gift tests … and asked others to take those same tests with me in mind. In fact, I took a class called “Discerning Your Ministry Identity” for my doctoral program, and the results always come out the same.
Teaching is my top gift. Prophecy is second.
I can’t foretell the future, so please don’t ask me who’s going to win the World Series or the election in November!
But I do sense the freedom to speak openly and candidly about cultural and personal issues from a biblical standpoint.
Here’s how this gift – featured in 1 Corinthians 14 – manifests itself in the life of a modern-day prophet:
First, prophets are drawn to controversy. I first discovered this at age 19. When I taught publicly, I wanted to talk about issues that others wouldn’t talk about.
Stephen Brown, author, pastor, and radio preacher, lived by this motto whenever he preached:
WHEN IN DOUBT, SAY IT.
Brown believed that whenever a pastor said something unplanned, those words would be more memorable and impactful to a congregation.
Maybe so … maybe not.
Some of the best things I’ve ever said … and some of the stupidest … occurred when I practiced that motto.
But like the prophets of old, sometimes I have to say things … because God’s word is like a fire in my bones.
Second, prophets feel free to talk about any subject.
Over the years, while having conversations with pastor friends, I’ve discovered that many of them are uncomfortable talking about certain issues from the pulpit.
Examples?
Giving to God’s work. Sex … even inside marriage. Homosexuality. Couples who live together outside marriage. Hell. The wrath of God. Intelligent design and creationism.
And you don’t know how many times I wanted to wade into politics … but didn’t.
But a pastor with the gift of prophecy says to himself, “If I don’t speak about these issues from Scripture, how will people know God’s mind on these topics?”
This is why I’m drawn to people who do talk about these issues.
It’s why I thought the late Chuck Colson was the best Christian speaker I’ve ever heard. When the Jim Bakker scandal broke in the late 1980s, I heard Colson publicly critique the prosperity gospel in a biblical, succinct, and devastating way. He was a modern-day prophet.
It’s why I’ve appreciated Bill Hybels’ ministry over the years. I used to become quite upset when Christians would criticize Hybels for watering down the gospel because I never found it to be true. He gave the best messages I’ve ever heard on substitutionary atonement … and hell … and abortion … and homosexuality … and he never pulled punches in the process.
I’m currently writing and talking about the devastating effects that the forced termination of pastors has on Christians, churches, and pastors and their families. This is not a topic most believers want to hear about, but this problem is becoming an epidemic in our country … and people are leaving their churches … and even their faith … because of the way these situations are being handled in local churches.
Someone has to speak up … and pray that God’s people will pay attention.
As a wise man once told me, some practices inside Christian churches can only be changed by people who are angry enough to speak out.
Third, the prophetic gift can go against one’s personality.
My two favorite Bible characters are Jeremiah and Timothy.
They both shrank from their calls to ministry.
They both felt unsuccessful.
They both felt like quitting at times.
And they were both sensitive men.
God took a sensitive man like Jeremiah … called him to be a prophet … told him in advance that his ministry would fail … and then insured that he was always alone!
That’s how it feels at time to have this gift.
If God gives someone the gift of prophecy, shouldn’t He give it to a person with an iron will and nerves of steel?
But sometimes He gives this gift to a person with a tender, bleeding heart.
You feel like a spiritual schizophrenic.
Prophets may feel fear before they speak … but they go out and speak anyway … with the authority of God Almighty behind them. As Paul said to the church at Corinth: “I came to you in weakness and fear, and much trembling” (1 Cor. 2:3).
But he still preached Christ to them … in the power of God’s Spirit.
Finally, prophets always pay a price when they use their gift.
Some prophets are abrasive and obnoxious when they exercise their gift. Keith Green … whose music I love … believed God had given him the prophetic gift, but he had a habit of slamming people when he used it. Before he died, he apologized for the way he used his gift.
Prophets are free to speak the mind of God to the people of God … they just have to do it in love.
Paul says in 1 Corinthians 13:2, “If I have the gift of prophecy … but have not love, I am nothing.”
Four years ago, the state of California was getting ready to vote on the definition of marriage … that marriage was between one man and one woman.
I have pastor friends who chose not to speak on that topic, stating that they weren’t going to change anybody’s mind about it.
But I believed … and still do … that we preachers had the opportunity to clearly delineate what God’s Word says on this issue. But as Paul says about prophecy, we needed to do it for people’s “strengthening, encouragement and comfort” (1 Cor. 14:3).
So I talked on “Defending Biblical Marriage.” Gay marriage proponents loudly proclaim their position … and if we Christians are silent, don’t they win the argument by default?
When I gave the message, I knew some people would applaud me … some would attack me … and some would abandon me.
But I had to do it … and would do it again in a heartbeat … even though I believe that message angered the enemy … and that he gradually began to cause damage from that moment on.
The church of Jesus needs prophets who proclaim the whole counsel of God.
And when they do, we need to pray for them, encourage them, and stand behind them … even when they say something that others don’t like … or even we don’t like.
The alternative is for the church of Jesus Christ to be biblically illiterate, culturally irrelevant, and spiritually impotent.
I am not the body. You are not the body.
I need your gifts … and you need mine.
Even the gift of prophecy.
Follow the way of love, and eagerly desire spiritual gifts, especially the gift of prophecy. 1 Corinthians 14:1
Share this:
Read Full Post »