Here is the second half of the introduction to my recently-published book Church Coup: A Cautionary Tale of Congregational Conflict. I sign all the books that are ordered from my website at www.restoringkingdombuilders.org You can also purchase the book from Amazon and other retailers.
__________
While there are fascinating studies on the forced termination of pastors, Christians need to hear more stories about this tragedy that happens behind closed doors. Yet pastors are afraid that if they tell their stories publicly, they will look foolish, rehearse their pain, sully their reputations, and damage their chances for future employment. So except for rare forays into the light, the involuntary dismissal of hundreds of pastors every month has escaped the notice of most Christians. Because most books on conflict are aimed at pastors and church leaders, my hope is to enlighten and empower lay people as well to ensure that conflicts involving pastors or staffers are handled in a just, deliberate, and biblical manner.
I may be violating some unwritten rule that says, “What happens in church stays in church.” Wouldn’t it be better for our careers and mental health if my wife and I refused to look back, learned from our mistakes, kept our mouths shut, and advanced full-speed ahead? But I believe it’s a greater evil to remain silent. What kind of a New Testament would we have if Paul had been mute about the problems in Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, Philippi, Thessalonica, Ephesus, and Crete? We have learned so much from those churches and their blunders.
Part of me wants to travel back in time and prevent my father’s forced exit. If I could help him with that situation, would he still be alive today? Although that notion may be unrealistic, I have sensed God calling me for years to do something to limit (and even eliminate) the unchristian practices that are inherent in forcing an innocent pastor to leave a church. Wouldn’t it advance the kingdom to prevent this tragedy from happening to other pastors and churches?
Let’s acknowledge that troubled pastors do exist. Some have character disorders or a narcissistic bent. Others are control freaks. A few are lazy. Some can even be tyrants. There are pastors who should be terminated – and even leave pastoral ministry altogether. But Alan Klaas, who investigated the causes of pastoral ousters in different Christian denominations, concluded that in 45 percent of the cases, a minority faction caused the pastor to leave, while “only seven percent of the time was the cause the personal misconduct of the minister.”[iii]
I have written this book with three purposes in mind. First, I want to share my side of a conflict as forthrightly as I can. Several weeks after the conflict surfaced, I sat in two public meetings and did not respond to any of the charges leveled against me. Three years later, I am able to articulate my responses with greater perspective. Others have differing views as to what happened, and that’s fine. This is not the final version of what happened in 2009, but my version as I experienced it. While the conflict occurred, I took careful notes, generated and received scores of emails, interacted with key players, and interviewed congregational experts.
Next, I want to seek redemption for what we’ve experienced. Rick Warren says that our greatest ministries emerge from our greatest sufferings:
“God intentionally allows you to go through painful experiences to equip you for ministry to others . . . . The very experiences that you have resented or regretted most in life – the ones you’ve wanted to hide and forget – are the experiences God wants to use to help others. They are your ministry! For God to use your painful experiences, you must be willing to share them. You have to stop covering them up, and you must honestly admit your faults, failures, and fears. Doing this will probably be your most effective ministry.”[iv]
While my wife and I are unimportant in the larger Christian community, maybe our willingness to share honestly about a painful experience will turn out to be our “most effective ministry.”
Finally, I want to prevent these kinds of conflicts from happening altogether. My prayer is that by reducing the fifty-day conflict to slow motion, God’s people will be able to identify key junctures and learn from both the wise – and foolish – decisions that were made. I also pray that believers will institute safeguards so that a similar conflict won’t invade their churches.
It is not my intent to seek revenge on those who hurt us. Although it took time, my wife and I have forgiven them and wish them God’s best in the days ahead. But for this story to help others, it must be reported with authenticity and emotion. My goal is to let believers know how quickly a conflict can spiral out of control and to recommend ways to handle matters that go against our feelings but are consistent with Scripture.
Because I come from a tradition where mostly men are considered for ordination, I will use terms that reflect that reality, although I greatly value the contributions women make in ministry.
Except for members of my immediate family, I have used aliases throughout this book to protect the identity of the individuals involved. I have also avoided naming my former community or church – but all the events related in this story are real to my knowledge.
May God use this book to help his people treat pastors and staff members with greater dignity and respect so they can serve him passionately and productively until Christ returns.
Book Excerpt: Provocative Quotations About Church Conflict
Posted in Church Conflict, Conflict with Church Antagonists, Conflict with the Pastor, Please Comment!, tagged Church Coup, quotations from church coup, quotations on church conflict on October 29, 2012| Leave a Comment »
With Hurricane Sandy beating upon the Eastern seaboard … and headed north toward my position in New England … let me share with you a few provocative quotations from my soon-to-be-published book on church conflict (called Church Coup) before the power goes out.
While these quotations have been wrested from their context, they are designed to make all of us think.
Here’s the first one from Lloyd Rediger on page 53 of his book Clergy Killers:
“Because the church as a whole has succumbed to the business model of operation . . . the pastor has become an employee, and parishioners the stockholders/customers. The pastor is hired to manage the small business we used to call a congregation. This means his primary task is to keep the stockholders happy; the secondary task is to produce and market an attractive product. When this mindset infects the church, the church is no longer a mission but has become a business . . . the introduction of a business mindset is producing dissonance in the church continually. For though businesses advocate mission and discipline, the budget is necessarily the bottom line. This is the reverse of how a healthy congregation functions.”
“Administration is a necessary part of directing a church’s life, but administration must always be a means and never an end. When deacons and other lay leaders see themselves primarily as administrators, then control is likely to be more important than ministry. When deacons emphasize that they are a ‘board’ (not a biblical concept), or when elders call themselves ‘ruling elders,’ watch out. Control will become the primary issue.”
Here’s a third quotation from page 53 of Peter Steinke’s book Congregational Leadership in Anxious Times:
“When we are flooded with anxiety, we can neither hear what is said without distortion nor respond with clarity. Bruce McEwen, a neuroendocrinologist, comments that stress limits our repertoire of responses. Fixated on what is endangering us, we forfeit our imaginative capacities. We act with a small and sometimes unproductive repertoire of behaviors. With fewer alternatives, we act foolishly . . . . Our mind is set in imaginative gridlock, we obsess about the threat, and our chances of changing our thinking are almost nonexistent.”
“Confidentiality just increases the amount of fear in the system. If we believe that we cannot share what is going on in a meeting or in a conflict, the secretive aura enhances rather than diminishes assessments of just how dangerous this situation is. The more that is shared, the more that is talked about, the less threatening the experience . . . . I can’t say enough about the problems of confidentiality in organizational settings. In my experience the norms of confidentiality are serious barriers to managing conflict. Secrets inhibit rather than open up communication, secrets raise fear, secrets keep out people who might be able to help, secrets presume that truth will enslave rather than set one free, secrets are often lies that keep the accused from confronting them because he or she supposedly doesn’t know the ‘charges.’”
Share this:
Like this:
Read Full Post »