It is the nature of a pastor to want everyone in a congregation to like him.
And when a pastor discovers that some people don’t like him, that revelation can be painful … especially if they eventually leave the church.
But sometimes those who don’t like the pastor choose to stay … and want him gone instead.
The pastor’s detractors start pooling their grievances against him … meeting secretly … and plotting their strategy to make him unemployed.
When he’s under attack, it’s natural for a pastor to focus on those who stand against him. After all, the knowledge that some people think you shouldn’t pastor their church is devastating.
But a healthier approach is for the pastor to ask himself, “How many allies do I still have in this church?”
The more allies … and the stronger their support … the better chance the pastor has of surviving any attacks against him.
Let me share with you seven kinds of allies that every pastor needs to survive internal attacks:
The first ally is God Himself.
If a pastor believes that he is innocent of wrongdoing before God … no matter what his opponents claim … then he may confidently count the Lord God among his allies.
I read Psalm 56 during my quiet time today. David begins:
“Be merciful to me, O God, for men hotly pursue me; all day long they press their attack. My slanderers pursue me all day long; many are attacking me in their pride. When I am afraid, I will trust in you. In God, whose word I praise, in God I trust; I will not be afraid. What can mortal man do to me?”
David believed strongly that God was 100% behind him. From his perspective, the Lord wasn’t on the side of his enemies; he was on David’s side. After all, God had called David to lead Israel, hadn’t He?
When a pastor is under attack, he needs to remind himself, “God called me to lead and shepherd this church. He did not call my detractors. Therefore, I will assume that God is on my side.”
A pastor can have no greater ally than God Himself.
Paul asks in Romans 8:31, “If God is for us, who can be against us?” This rings true in the spiritual realm.
Yet inside a congregation, a pastor may sense that God fully supports him … and yet get bounced by people who aren’t listening to God.
So the pastor needs human allies as well … the more, the better.
The second ally is the pastor’s wife.
If a pastor’s wife doesn’t respect him, or doesn’t believe he should be in ministry, or wants nothing to do with the local church, her feelings will impact her husband’s ability to pastor.
In such cases, it would be better for a pastor to leave ministry and work on his marriage than to stay in the church and eventually lose both his marriage and his ministry.
But if a pastor’s wife is solidly behind him … if she tells her husband, “I support you no matter what anyone else thinks” … if she listens to his fears and takes care of his needs and prays with him when he’s under attack … then that pastor can truly count his wife among his allies.
Before we met 42 years ago, my wife wanted to be a missionary. I felt called to be a pastor.
Because of her love for me, she was willing to submerge her dreams and serve at my side throughout my 35+ years of church ministry.
On those rare occasions when I was attacked, she stood solidly beside me.
I cannot imagine a better human ally.
The third ally is the church’s governing documents.
Whenever a group inside a church chooses to attack their pastor, they often fail to consult their church’s constitution and bylaws.
Those governing documents were adopted when church leaders were calm and thinking clearly. And they usually specify how the congregation is to behave when people have become reactive and irrational toward their pastor.
When pastors contact me and tell me they’re under attack, I ask them, “What do your governing documents say about how to remove a pastor?”
Sadly, in too many cases, the church doesn’t have any governing documents … and it’s too late to create them when a group wants the pastor’s scalp.
The governing documents are really a legal and organizational ally. And if they do specify how a pastor is to be removed from office … and the pastor’s detractors ignore them … then they need to be told … possibly by a board or staff member … that their efforts will not be recognized unless they conform to church protocol.
No church should ever abide by the law of the jungle.
Since most groups opposing a pastor thrive in the dark but wilt in the light, just informing them that they’re violating “church law” can be enough for them to stop … or at least adjust their strategy.
The fourth ally is the official church board.
If the Lord, the pastor’s wife, and the church’s governing documents are all on the pastor’s side, then everything comes down to where the official board stands regarding the pastor’s future.
Whether they’re called elders, deacons, trustees, the church council, the board of directors, or something else, the official board … usually voted in by the congregation … can make or break a pastor’s position.
Some observations:
*If the board chairman strongly supports the pastor, that’s a huge advantage. During my 25 years as a solo or senior pastor, every board chairman fully stood behind me … except the last one.
*If a majority of the board stands behind the pastor … including the chairman … then it will be difficult for the pastor’s detractors to prevail.
*Much of the time, when a group attacks the pastor, they already have one or two allies on the church board … maybe more. The group is emboldened largely because they have friends in high places. Those board members often remain quiet about their position until they sense they’re going to prevail … and only then will they make their position known.
*If the entire board stands behind the pastor, then it may not matter who stands against him.
*If the entire board caves on the pastor, then it may not matter who else stands behind him.
Nearly 30 years ago … when I was in my mid-thirties … I was attacked by the Senior’s Sunday School class at my church. They compiled a list of my faults, met with two board members, and demanded that the board remove me from office.
To a man, the board stood solidly behind me. And they told me privately that if I resigned, they would all quit as well … thereby turning the church over to the Seniors … who knew absolutely nothing about leading a church.
When the board told the Seniors they supported me, the Seniors all left … when they disappeared, we were free to pursue God’s vision for our church … but it took time.
Judith Viorst once wrote a book called Necessary Losses. That’s what those Seniors were.
The fifth ally is the church staff.
This includes the church secretary/office manager … the worship/music director … the youth director/pastor … and any associate pastors.
I have known office managers who undermined the pastor … right under his nose … from inside the church office.
I have known worship/music directors who insisted that worship be done their way … even if the pastor disagreed.
I have known youth pastors who openly rebelled against their pastor … and quietly joined his opposition.
I have known associate pastors who wanted their pastor’s job … and were willing to do or say almost anything to get it.
But I have also known staff members who were completely loyal … utterly faithful … and totally supportive of their pastor.
I believe that if a pastor has the support of his entire board and staff, no group in the church can push him out.
Knowing this, most groups that seek to remove a pastor have to find allies on the board and/or staff.
Even if the entire board collapses their support for their pastor, if certain key staff members stand with the pastor, he may be able to survive … but the combination of key board/staff members who don’t support their pastor can be deadly.
Sometimes a pastor knows that a staff member doesn’t fully support his leadership, but the pastor lets that person stay on because they’re doing a good job … or because they’re afraid of the fallout should that person be fired.
Staff support can be tricky.
The sixth ally is key church opinion makers.
This would include former staff members … board members … and church leaders who are still in the church.
And sometimes, this includes people who have moved away but whose opinion others still value.
When I went through my attack five-and-a-half years ago, some of my best allies were two former board members and a former staff member from inside the church. They worked behind-the-scenes to call for a fair process dealing with particular issues.
I also consulted with two former board chairmen … one from my previous church, another from my current one … and their counsel was invaluable.
If the former board members had stood against me, I might have instantly resigned … but they wanted me to stay.
If the former board chairmen thought I was out of line, I might have quit … but they encouraged me to hang in there.
If a pastor is under attack, and doesn’t have any ecclesiastical allies, that might be a sign he needs to trade a resignation letter for a severance package.
But if he does have prominent church allies … even if they don’t currently hold offices … they can sway a lot of people.
The seventh and final ally is vocal churchgoers.
When a pastor is under attack, and the charges against him float through the congregation, most people don’t know whether they should believe what they’re hearing.
The focus of most people is on whether or not the charges are true.
But a better way is to ask whether a fair and just process is being used with the pastor.
The pastor’s opponents will tell people, “The pastor is guilty of this … we heard him say that … and we don’t like the fact he does this.”
But does the pastor know what’s being said about him? Does he know who has lined up against him? And has he been given the opportunity to respond to the charges that are going around?
When a group presses charges against a pastor, they’re hoping that people become reactive and emotional and demand en masse that their pastor leave.
But when others come along and insist on a fair and just process, they’re hoping to calm down people … engage their brains … and determine the truth before demanding anything.
Every church needs a group of fair-minded, spiritual, and vocal members who tell the pastor’s detractors, “We will not let you engage in a lynch mob to dismiss our pastor. Whether he’s innocent or guilty of your charges, let’s take our time and work through a fair and just process first.”
These people comprise a pastor’s ecclesiastical safety net.
When Elisha and his servant were in Dothan (2 Kings 6), Elisha’s servant got up early and saw “an army with horses and chariots” surrounding the city … and he instantly panicked.
But Elisha remarked, “Don’t be afraid. Those who are with us are more than those who are with them.”
When the Lord opened his servant’s eyes, he saw “the hills full of horses and chariots of fire all around Elisha” … the armies of the Lord.
Sometimes a church is full of horses and chariots surrounding the pastor, too … a pastor just needs someone to open his eyes.

Five Realities about Denominations and Pastor-Church Conflict
Posted in Conflict with Church Antagonists, Conflict with Church Board, Conflict with the Pastor, Pastoral Termination, Please Comment!, tagged church conflict and denominations, pastoral termination, pastoral termination and denominations on June 3, 2015| Leave a Comment »
I recently spoke with a retired pastor in his mid-eighties about his denominational ties.
This pastor told me that he’s very upset about the division inside his denomination over a particular social issue. Pastors and churches have been pulling out of the denomination which grieves this pastor’s heart.
But he went on to tell me that with all its problems, he would never leave the denomination.
He was educated by their school … pastored several of their churches … has his medical insurance with them … and receives retirement checks from them. He has also made many friends within the denomination over the years.
In other words, my friend has been loyal to his denomination, and they have been loyal to him in return.
Thirty-five years ago, when I pursued ordination with my home church, I expected that my relationship with that church’s denomination would go equally as well. I would be loyal to them, and they would be loyal to me.
But it didn’t work out that way … and it rarely does for pastors who have experienced attacks that lead to forced termination.
I was in the same denomination for 31 years.
For the first 15 years, I did everything I was asked to do: attend district and national meetings … serve on district committees … befriend my pastoral colleagues … talk up district retreats and events inside my church … let their missionaries speak during worship services … and demonstrate loyalty to the denomination as a whole.
For my last 16 years, I did not attend meetings … serve on committees … or talk up retreats. I did have some friendships with district pastors, and I let a few missionaries come and present their ministries, but that was it.
I found that district and denominational work was distracting and pulled me away from my true calling as a local church pastor. When you’re in a smaller church setting, you have more time for district activities, but as your church grows, it becomes more difficult to justify taking time and energy away from your church. (After all, who is paying you?)
So when I went through a horrendous conflict in my last ministry five-and-a-half years ago, I did not expect any assistance from our local district office.
But I talk all the time with pastors who express to me how hurt … and even outraged … they are that their district minister/superintendent did not provide support for them when they experienced personal attacks.
So let me share with you five realities that I’ve learned the hard way about denominations and pastor-church conflict:
First, denominations are more politically-oriented than they are spiritual.
When a rookie pastor finally learns this truth, it’s devastating.
One pastor told me that when he assumed his first pastorate, his district leader told him that if he ever needed any counsel or support, he would be there for him.
But when this pastor found himself under fire, and he did contact his district official, he had already sided with the pastor’s detractors inside the church.
That’s not spirituality in action. That’s politics, pure and simple.
Let me share a sad but true story of denominational politics in action.
When I applied for ordination in my district almost four decades ago, I met with an ordination committee that provided counsel for my upcoming ordination council. One of the three committee members was a prominent pastor in the denomination.
Soon after that committee meeting, that pastor was discovered to be guilty of sexual misconduct with someone other than his wife.
If that kind of wrongdoing had happened with almost any other pastor, he would have been placed under discipline for at least two years before being recommended for another church.
But this pastor was a well-known speaker and author … and was well-connected inside the denomination.
Know where he ended up? I heard him preach one Sunday … as the senior pastor of the largest church in the entire denomination.
This pastor committed a major moral offense … and was promoted!
But he repeated his mistake in that megachurch … and after moving to district headquarters, repeated it still again.
Why was this pastor moved from place to place even though he obviously hadn’t changed?
As an influential leader later told me, it’s because the denomination was “a good old boy network” … and this pastor was a “good old boy.”
In other words, personalities and politics trumped principles.
I am not saying that people who work for denominations are unspiritual, but that the political aspect is more pronounced in denominational decision-making than most pastors could ever guess.
So when a pastor gets into trouble inside his own church, and his district minister doesn’t support him, that pastor may be expendable because he’s on the wrong side of denominational politics.
Second, pastoral participation in district activities is far more important than most pastors realize.
Many district ministers evaluate a pastor not on the basis of his walk with God … or his congregational leadership … or his church’s effectiveness … but on how often the pastor attends district functions, and how much money the pastor’s church contributes to the district.
For years, I tried to convince myself that this wasn’t true … but it is.
A pastor who went to the denominational college or seminary … and shows up to district functions … and whose church gives generously to district coffers … becomes “our kind of guy.”
And the pastor who didn’t attend denominational schools … or doesn’t attend district events … or whose church gives little to the district … is someone that the DM would like to see leave so he can be replaced by “our kind of guy.”
In other words, pastors who don’t show blind loyalty to the denomination will not be shown loyalty in return … no matter how badly they’ve been mistreated by their church.
However, I know of at least one exception to this principle.
Ten years ago, I had a conversation after class with a professor in my Doctor of Ministry program. He is one of the most influential leaders in the Christian world.
We were both in the same denomination at the time, and I told him that I was feeling a bit guilty for not attending denominational meetings for years.
He asked me, “Why does it bother you?” After I shared a response, he told me, “I’ve been to three meetings in 28 years.”
I never felt guilty about that issue again.
Third, denominational leaders have a history of playing it safe.
I served as the pastor of four churches over the course of 25 years.
When I didn’t take risks, those churches didn’t grow. When I did take risks, they usually did grow … but conflict was the price that I paid.
Why? Because change … even when it’s wildly successful … always makes somebody angry.
There is no meaningful growth in a church without change … which leads to conflict … and if a pastor is afraid of conflict, his church probably won’t grow.
But when a district is looking for a minister/superintendent, they don’t want someone whose past ministries have experienced conflict. Conflict in past churches may be a precursor of conflict in many district churches in the future.
The district wants someone nice … organized … safe … and predictable instead.
I was in the same denominational district for 27 years. During that time, there were four district ministers.
I don’t know how the first leader was chosen … but I know how the other three were selected: all were members of the district’s trustee board.
They were diplomatic … known quantities … and solid individuals … but they didn’t do or say anything that could remotely be considered risky.
So when a district minister hears about a pastor who has taken some risks … and angered some churchgoers in the process … he can’t relate to that pastor. After all, he spent his entire ministry trying to placate people in various congregations.
So instead of understanding that pastor … and empathizing with him … and standing behind him … the district minister blames the pastor for the entire conflict.
In our district, the DM encouraged churches to grow … and growing churches were highlighted at district meetings.
But when some pastors took the necessary risks … and implemented change … their leadership was challenged, and conflict broke out in their church.
Those pastors rightly expected that their DM would stand behind them … especially since they were trying to obey Christ’s Great Commission and “make disciples of all the nations.”
But when pastors find themselves under fire in their churches … and later discover that their DM is standing against them as well … it’s enough to send a pastor into spiritual and emotional despair.
This leads us to the next reality:
Fourth, denominational leaders usually side with the pastor’s antagonists over against the pastor.
There is a growing body of literature today that blames most church conflicts on church boards and/or factions. For example, Alan Klaas, who investigated why pastors are forced out of office in different denominations, concluded that in 45% of the cases, a minority faction pushed the pastor out, while only 7% of the time was the pastor’s misconduct the primary factor.
When I provide counsel to pastors about the attacks that they’re undergoing, I’m appalled by the tactics that church laymen use to force out their pastor. You won’t find them anywhere in the New Testament … they lack love and grace … and if they’d use similar tactics in a secular company, they’d be sued in a heartbeat.
So how in the world can a district minister close his eyes to evil … ignore the demands of righteousness … and castigate the pastor for all the problems in a church?
In their book Pastors in Transition: Why Clergy Leave Local Church Ministry, researchers Dean Hoge and Jacqueline Wenger state that 42% of their respondents left church ministry because they didn’t feel they were supported by denominational officials when they needed help the most.
Most pastors don’t know this until they contact their district minister for help … and discover that their adversaries have already bent his ear.
And sadly, many DMs … like many Christians … believe the first person who tells them about a conflict.
When my conflict occurred, my district minister … who had been on the job barely a month … called me about the conflict because someone from the church had called him about it. Fortunately, I hired a consultant who came to the church … interviewed staff … witnessed two destructive meetings … and collaborated with my DM to expose the plot against me.
If I hadn’t hired that consultant … who was well-respected in the larger Christian community … where would that DM have come down?
I don’t really know. But I had a hard time trusting anyone in his position because of what had happened to me twenty years earlier.
Five years into my second pastorate, I was attacked by a seniors class.
My district minister then recommended that I resign.
Why? Because I had committed some great sin?
No, because a guy named Bob and the seniors were upset with me … and they were very vocal … even though they were the only ones who were upset.
I knew what unilateral resignation meant: financial ruin (we had no savings and didn’t own a house) … the possible end of my pastoral career … an incredible strain on my wife to be the immediate family breadwinner … and being forced to move and live with family somewhere.
Fortunately, I waited three days before making my decision, and met with the church board first. To a man, they all stood behind me and said, “If you resign, we’re all going to resign as well.”
I stayed … let Bob and the seniors leave … and began rebuilding the ministry … which improved greatly without Bob and his gang around.
But I will never forget that when I needed him the most, my district minister collapsed on me.
Thankfully, I have heard of a few district ministers who stand behind their pastors when they’re attacked, but my guess is that 90% of them stand with the pastor’s antagonists instead.
Why is this?
Because it’s easier to find another pastor than it is to plant and build another church … and if the DM stands with the pastor, he’s afraid of alienating the “winners” in the conflict … who might withhold their giving to the district, or pull their church out of the denomination altogether.
Finally, it’s usually counterproductive to trust a district leader with any confidential information.
When I became a pastor, I viewed my district minister as a “pastor to pastors” … and he encouraged that perspective. But boy, did he dish out confidential information about other pastors … in some cases, bordering on slander.
Naively, I shared some real struggles with my next two district ministers … and in both cases, that information was later used against me.
Unless you have spoken to other pastors under fire … and know for certain that your district minister is someone you can trust … I wouldn’t tell him anything that could later be used against you.
It’s far better to speak to a Christian counselor … a friend who lives some distance away … or a former professor … than to trust most district officials … some of whom continually manipulate the district chessboard so they can get “their kind of guy” placed.
_______________
A longtime pastor friend worked for a denominational office for many years. Nearly twenty years ago, he told me that the denomination was “a dying organization.”
I felt then … and I still feel today … that the success or failure of a denomination rests with how strongly district leaders support their pastors … not how strongly pastors support their district office.
I told a story in my book Church Coup about a pastor whose church grew from 80 to 370 in fifteen months, followed by the building of a new sanctuary which was quickly filled. But as more people came, a group in the church began losing influence and wanted to snatch it back, launching a major conflict. The pastor tried to follow the advice of his DM and be redemptive, but the DM later demanded that the pastor resign, even though he had done nothing wrong.
This pastor later learned that he was the 28th innocent pastor within a twelve-month period to be forced to resign in that district.
Until the above scenario changes, I question how much time and energy a local church pastor should give his district and denomination.
I’m 100% behind advancing the worldwide kingdom of God … but skeptical about supporting a denomination that expects the loyalty of its pastors without giving back loyalty in return.
Sounds like a bad deal, doesn’t it?
Share this:
Read Full Post »