The key to preventing conflict in a group – whether it’s your family, your workplace, your neighborhood, or your church – is understanding the role that anxiety plays.
This is what family sytems theory teaches.
In my last post, I mentioned a woman named Ethel who is undergoing overwhelming anxiety in her own life.
Then she comes to church on Sunday … hoping to receive encouragement and comfort … and discovers that the music director has left the church without explanation.
With her anxiety already sky-high, she begins doing what all anxious people do.
She complains … to anyone who will listen.
The church is now in a dangerous place.
There are two kinds of anxiety in a church: acute or chronic.
Acute anxiety is crisis generated. When the giving is falling behind budget, or there’s an influx of new members, or there’s a major shift in lay leadership, acute anxiety appears.
In a healthy congregation, the events causing acute anxiety are acknowledged and addressed so the anxiety is eventually abated. People regain their perspective and are able to control their reactivity.
But chronic anxiety is embedded deep within the church system. It’s a condition that never ends. Even the slightest change in a church triggers reactive behavior.
To obtain relief from this anxiety, chronically anxious members act out their anxiety by making accusations, exaggerating events, and spreading rumors. They’re uncomfortable with the way they feel, and so attempt to displace their anxiety onto others.
Imagine that you’re a member of the church I mentioned above. The music director is no longer on the staff, and Ethel comes to you after the service to complain.
She’s angry with the pastor for not getting along with the music director.
She’s angry with several people on the music team she suspects pushed out the music director.
She’s angry that the music director is gone because she liked both him and his music.
What should you do?
First, let Ethel know that you can’t do anything about her complaints.
Second, encourage her to speak with the pastor or board members and share her concerns with them. In fact, offer to go with her to speak with them if necessary.
Finally, let Ethel know that while she has the right to speak with a leader about this issue, she does not have the right to complain indiscriminately to others in the church.
Because Ethel wants someone to listen to her, validate her feelings, and take away all her anxiety.
But if you agree with her complaints – and throw in a few of your own – you have assumed her anxiety and you are dangerously close to becoming divisive.
It is not divisive to disagree with church leaders mentally.
It is not divisive to disagree with church leaders to their faces.
It is not divisive to disagree with church leaders when talking to a friend or family member.
But it is divisive to pool complaints with others … because people who share gripes are ripe to form an unofficial coalition. And if they can find a leader … or a complainer offers to take on the task … they will start meeting in private.
And then they will put the needs of their group ahead of the church and start making demands.
And then you have division.
Church consultant Peter Steinke writes:
“It is the chronically anxious individuals in the church family who are apt to conduct a ‘search and destroy mission.’ They will not hesitate to impose their wills on others. They make hostages of their gifts, attendance, and participation. They employ their stewardship as brinksmanship. Their ultimate threat is to run away from home – transferring or terminating their membership if an action is not rescinded, a person is not removed, or a demand is not satisfied. These tactics are effective in church families that place a premium on peace and harmony.”
If those who are upset about the departure of the music director would speak with church leaders directly, they might discover the real reason why he left … which might alleviate their anxiety.
But if they don’t engage the leaders, and decide to take matters into their own hands, they’ll just make a mess of things and trigger even more anxiety in their congregation.
If and when those with complaints share their concerns with the church’s leadership, the way the leaders respond is crucial. The key to church health is how the leaders respond whenever anxiety surfaces.
The more threatened the leaders feel, the more the congregation can be disrupted.
The more calmly the leaders manage anxiety, the safer people feel.
According to conflict expert Ronald Richardson, it’s the job of effective leaders to help keep down the anxiety level in the emotional system of the congregation.
And effective leaders do this best by managing their own anxiety.
When my wife and I were first married, we lived behind a church.
One Sunday, we visited that church.
As soon as we walked into the worship center, you could cut the tension with a knife. Seriously.
The pastor stood up and gave announcements for twenty minutes. The church was making changes in their scheduling, and he wanted to explain the changes to the congregation.
Good move.
But he spent so much time explaining that he became defensive. I could sense that his explanation wasn’t working.
It wasn’t long before he was looking for another job.
I don’t know who, if anyone, was the human culprit in that situation. But I do know that unchecked anxiety assumed control of that church. I could feel it … and I was an outsider.
People probably blamed the pastor for things.
He probably blamed some board members and powerbrokers.
But most likely, the leaders allowed anxiety to run amok … and when that happens, chronically anxious individuals either leave the church or try and push out key leaders … usually the pastor.
The lesson is simple:
If you’re a parent, keep the atmosphere in your home calm.
If you’re a boss, make sure and manage the anxiety in your workplace.
If you’re a church leader, do what you can to keep anxiety from spilling out into your congregation.
Because as anxiety goes up in an organization, conflict escalates.
But when anxiety goes down, so does conflict.
What have you witnessed along this line?
Blaming Others for My Mistakes
Posted in Church Conflict, Church Health and Conflict, Conflict with Church Antagonists, Please Comment!, tagged 1 John 1:8; 1 John 1:10, raising responsible kids, sociopaths in church on June 4, 2012| 4 Comments »
Most mornings, while working out on my treadmill, I run to classic rock while watching ESPN.
This morning, I saw highlights from last night’s Celtics-Heat playoff game.
Paul Pierce of the Celtics bulldozed over another player during overtime and was called for a foul … and fouled out of the game.
But did he do it? According to Pierce’s body language, he did NOTHING wrong and shouldn’t have been called for any foul.
Then LeBron James backed into a defender on the other side of the court and both of them fell down. When James was called for the foul – and he too fouled out – he couldn’t believe it.
It was the defender’s fault … or the ref’s fault … or the fault of Boston Garden (which seems to make “homers” out of refs) … or the fault of those little green leprechauns that inhabit the Garden.
But LeBron James’ fault? No way.
There was a show on TV when I was a kid called Romper Room. Believe it or not, I had the show’s theme song on record. The chorus went like this:
I always do what’s right
I never do anything wrong
I’m a Romper Room do bee
A do bee all day long
Seems to me the first two lines of that song perfectly encapsulate the attitudes of millions of people in our country … especially the second line: “I never do anything wrong.”
A Christian counselor friend of mine once told me that we’re raising a generation of sociopaths. The latest estimates are that 4% of the population has anti-social personality disorder (the new term for sociopathy), characterized by a complete lack of conscience.
As Dr. Archibald Hart told me after class one day, the sociopath feels no anxiety before doing wrong and feels no guilt afterward. This person lacks a moral core. While the sociopath can be outwardly charming, he or she is inwardly manipulative.
And what does this person want more than anything else in life?
To win.
The sociopath will do anything to win.
They choose targets … people who threaten them or who they think are weak … and then bully them or abuse them or lie to them just to watch them squirm.
You’ll find these people running countries … and supervising employees at work … and in families … and in politics … and even in your neighborhood. (Dr. Martha Stout’s excellent book The Sociopath Next Door asks this question on its cover: Who is the devil you know?)
Although a layman cannot properly diagnose someone as a sociopath – it takes a well-trained psychologist to do so – we can at least suspect someone of having the condition if they demonstrate certain symptoms.
The reason I bring this up is that the last place we’d expect to find a sociopath is in a Christian church. After all, isn’t the confession of sin a requirement for both conversion and spiritual growth?
As 1 John 1:8 puts it, “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” Verse 10 goes on to say, “If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives.”
And yet sociopaths slip into church leadership … and onto church staffs … and behind church pulpits … fooling EVERYBODY along the way.
I’ve worked with a handful of church leaders that I suspected fit this description.
They were charismatic individuals.
They ignored authority.
They made the same mistakes over and over again … and didn’t learn anything from them. (One leader kept getting traffic tickets, and instead of changing his behavior, he’d fight the tickets in court … and win.)
They put on a facade of charm for their adoring public … while engaging in sabotage behind the scenes. (Whenever I had to correct their behavior, they would tell their fans, who would become upset with me.)
But what I’m most concerned about isn’t the presence of sociopaths in churches.
I’m most concerned about the fact that we’re raising sociopaths in Christian homes.
Let me give you an example.
Imagine that you have a daughter named Jane, who is in the fourth grade.
One day, Jane’s teacher calls you at work and tells you that Jane’s grades are poor and that she’s been misbehaving in class. The teacher wants to meet with you … right away.
So you meet with Jane’s teacher, who shows you copies of Jane’s incomplete and poorly done assignments … and shows you indisputable proof via surveillance that Jane’s behavior in class is out of control.
Once upon a time, you and Jane’s teacher would collaborate together and come up with a plan for dealing with Jane’s behavior. Call it a PTA … a parent teacher alliance. With a strong alliance between school and home, Jane would be forced to change her behavior.
But what happens in our day? You become incensed because Jane’s teacher doesn’t view your daughter as being perfect … so you blame Jane’s teacher for Jane’s misbehavior … as well as the school … and the curriculum … and Jane’s classmates … as well as President Bush. (Can you believe that some people are still blaming him for problems in our country, even though he hasn’t been president for almost four years?)
Instead of forming a PTA, you have just formed a PCA (parent-child alliance) with your daughter and against her teacher … and by extension, every other authority that will come into her life.
And what will happen to Jane? She may grow intellectually … and vocationally … but she won’t be able to grow emotionally or spiritually.
Why not?
Because you, as her parent, will not let her learn from her mistakes.
Could this be a reason why so many college graduates are living at home with their parents? Just asking.
I’ll have more to say on this matter next time …
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this matter.
Share this:
Read Full Post »