When a pastor is forced to leave his congregation, who is to blame?
Some inside a church will instantly proclaim, “The pastor is completely responsible for his demise. He is 100% at fault.”
Others will insist, “The pastor isn’t to blame for his departure. It was that spineless board … that heartless faction … or even the devil himself that caused this mess!”
The truth usually lies somewhere in between these two extremes.
In my book Church Coup, I quoted church conflict expert Speed Leas, who wrote about a research project along this line:
“While we could find some situations that were primarily the congregation’s ‘fault’ … and we could find some that were primarily the pastor’s ‘fault’ … these occurrences were rare. Most of the time we found a mixture of congregational and pastoral causes that defied unraveling as to who ‘started it.’ Asking the question ‘Whose fault is it?’ in the church seemed to tangle people up … more than it helped … in our research into 127 ‘involuntary terminations’ or firings, we found the need to find fault to be one of the most characteristic and least helpful dimensions of the conflict … it is almost never the case that one party is exclusively in the wrong.”
This issue has been rattling around in my head for years, so let me mention five common scenarios involving a pastor’s departure … along with a general assessment of responsibility in each case:
First, if a pastor is guilty of a major offense, he is fully responsible for his own departure.
If a pastor is guilty of heresy, he should be fired and removed from office.
I read about a pastor many years ago who began teaching universalism, the belief that everyone – even Satan – will eventually be saved and go to heaven.
Since universalism perverts the gospel (if everyone can be saved, why did Jesus die?), the church was justified in removing that pastor from office, although he caused untold damage in the process.
If a pastor is guilty of sexual immorality, he should be removed from office as well.
I heard about a pastor who had an affair with a woman in his church for twenty years. Twenty years!
How could he preach from the Holy Bible … serve Holy Communion … and even relate to the Holy Spirit while engaging in such conduct?
When the church board finally discovered the pastor’s misconduct, they took steps to remove him from office quickly.
Some experts believe these are the only two offenses that should merit a pastor’s forced termination, but I’d like to add a third: criminal behavior.
If a pastor has physically abused his wife … engaged in fraudulent financial behavior … assaulted people violently … or embezzled funds from his church … how can he stay as pastor?
He can’t.
When information about the pastor’s excessive misconduct comes to the attention of the church board, they should still:
*meet with the pastor
*ask him for his side of the story
*deliberate together prayerfully
*ask him to repent, if they discern he’s guilty
*aim for his restoration, not his destruction, if they remove him from office
But even if the board doesn’t handle the pastor’s departure perfectly, the pastor who is guilty of one of The Big Three has cooked his own goose.
However, this doesn’t mean that God is done with such individuals forever.
Second, if a church board has warned a pastor about a problem, and he’s failed to change his behavior within a reasonable time, the pastor is usually responsible for his own demise.
This scenario makes some assumptions … that the church board has:
*identified an area of the pastor’s life or ministry that needs changing
*spoken to the pastor directly and seriously about their concerns
*given the pastor enough time to turn things around
*monitored the pastor’s progress through the use of markers
*told the pastor what will happen if he doesn’t comply with their directives
Let’s say a pastor makes occasional insulting comments on Facebook to people from his church. And let’s say that five people he has insulted are hopping mad and threaten to leave the church if the pastor’s behavior continues.
Once the church board approaches the pastor about this matter, he should do all he can to comply with their wishes, even if he doesn’t agree with each example they cite.
The pastor might choose to eliminate his Facebook page altogether … or write a message on Facebook apologizing for his behavior … or resolve to only write positive comments from now on … or at least refrain from saying anything that could be negatively interpreted.
But if the pastor continues to make insulting comments after being warned against it, then the pastor is to blame if the board reluctantly asks for his resignation.
There are church boards that work the steps I’ve listed above, but most boards don’t operate in such a clear manner. They become anxious about the pastor’s behavior … handle things reactively rather than proactively … finally meet together in secret to discuss the issues … and only speak with the pastor directly when things have spun out of control.
And by then, it’s usually too late.
But if the board does everything right, and the pastor doesn’t change after a reasonable amount of time … he shouldn’t be surprise if he’s asked to pack his bags.
Third, if it becomes obvious that the pastor isn’t a good match for the church or the community, the blame for the pastor’s departure should be shared equally.
That is, the board should assume some of the blame, and the pastor should assume some of the blame.
Thirty years ago, I put out some resumes and had several phone interviews with search teams.
One was in Bay City, Michigan. Another was in Rochester, New York.
The search team in Michigan liked me, but they asked me this question: “How would you feel about living so far away from your family in the West?”
Up to that time, all I cared about was leaving the church I was pastoring. But they made me think about something I hadn’t really considered … and they were right.
Had I gone to Bay City, that church would have become our family, and neither my wife nor I would have seen our own parents or siblings very often.
If the board hadn’t asked me that question, and I had gone to Bay City, and it didn’t work out, they would be partially to blame.
But if I had gone there, and it didn’t work out, I’d share the blame as well.
I once heard about a pastor who was called from the South to a large church in Northern California. His teenage daughter was forced to leave her boyfriend behind.
The girl became so depressed and distraught that the pastor resigned and returned to the South after less than a month in California.
It’s easy to say, “The pastor was totally at fault. He never should have left the South.” But it’s possible the search team didn’t look at the situation as carefully as they should have.
Mismatches usually reveal themselves pretty quickly. It’s best if both the pastor and the search team admit, “We thought this would work out, but we can’t see it happening. We’ll both take responsibility for this situation and not blame the other party.”
Fourth, if the board is happy with their pastor’s ministry, but the pastor is under attack, and the board fails to support him adequately, and the pastor resigns, the board is more at fault than the pastor.
Let’s say that Pastor Warren has been at Mercy Fellowship for six years. And let’s say that Mercy’s attendance and giving have both doubled during that time.
And let’s say that ninety percent of the congregation loves Pastor Warren and that they are solidly behind his ministry … including the elders.
But one day, five people from an internal faction ask to meet with two of the elders. They claim that Pastor Warren hasn’t been attending denominational meetings … that the church isn’t giving enough to the denomination … and that if things don’t change quickly, thirty people will leave the church.
So the two elders share this conversation with the other elders, and they speak with Pastor Warren at their next regular meeting.
Pastor Warren responds, “That’s right, I don’t attend denominational meetings. I went to some my first several years here, but I found them to be a waste of time. I’ve shared my stance with the elders before. And we don’t give much money to the denomination because frankly, all we’re doing is propping up a bureaucracy run by a good old boys network. I’d rather we invest in more productive ministries.”
The elders now have a choice. They can back their pastor, or they can back the faction, but if they don’t back their pastor, he may choose to resign … and that will hurt the church far more than if the faction left.
I once knew a pastor who grew a megachurch. One day, he fired a staff member. The board hired him back. The pastor resigned.
Pastors aren’t infallible. Sometimes they get things wrong. But the board needs to know that if they fail to support their pastor publicly, the pastor might choose to resign instead … and that will leave the board in charge of the church until they call a new pastor.
Finally, if a board fires a pastor without warning or explanation, the fault lies almost exclusively with the board.
Pastors aren’t mind readers. They assume that things are going well unless somebody says, “We’re concerned about this particular issue.”
And a pastor should feel that way. You can’t minister effectively if you’re walking around all day asking, “I wonder who’s mad at me? I wonder if I’ve done something wrong?”
But a common scenario I hear from pastors is, “I thought everything in my ministry was going fine. And then the board called me into a meeting after the morning worship service and they fired me.”
A board that would do that is composed of cowards.
If a church board is upset with their pastor, they have a responsibility to:
*schedule a meeting with him
*tell him to his face what their concerns are
*allow the pastor to offer feedback
*create a plan with the pastor’s input
*revisit the plan at reasonable intervals
How much time should the pastor be given?
Church conflict expert Peter Steinke says twelve to fifteen months. If there hasn’t been sufficient improvement by then, the board has every right to remove the pastor.
The beauty of this approach is that the pastor can decide whether or not he wants to stay. If he thinks the board has been unfair … or that he can’t change … or that he doesn’t need to change … then he has time to search for another ministry.
But most boards don’t do this. They fail to tell the pastor their concerns directly … speak only among themselves … blame the pastor for not changing … work themselves into a high state of anxiety … and then fire the pastor abruptly.
And when a board fires an innocent pastor (that is, he’s not guilty of any major offense) suddenly, they’ve now bought their church two to five years of misery … or a gradual death spiral.
_______________
I believe there are times when a pastor needs to be removed from office.
But even when that becomes necessary, the pastor still should be treated with dignity, compassion, fairness, and grace … not abuse, insensitivity, injustice, and revenge.
The pastor and his family should also be given a generous severance package so they can transition financially into their next season of life. Church boards that fire their pastors with little or no severance are denying the faith they claim to believe.
And the church board should tell the congregation as much as they can … not as little as possible … about why the pastor left if they want to reestablish trust.
Can you think of any other common scenarios that I missed?
“My Pastor is a Dictator!”
Posted in Conflict with Church Board, Conflict with the Pastor, Pastoral Termination, Please Comment!, tagged confronting a pastor, firing a pastor, pastoral termination, pastors who are dictators on July 27, 2018| 6 Comments »
One of the most common complaints that church leaders have about their pastor is this one:
“He acts like a dictator.”
This complaint usually states that the pastor:
*spends money without authorization
*makes major decisions unilaterally
*withholds valuable information from key leaders
*verbally abuses staff members
*threatens people who try to confront him
*doesn’t listen to people’s concerns or complaints
*becomes angry easily
All too many pastors want to run the church their way … and they will take down anyone who tries to oppose them.
The difference between leaders and dictators:
*Leadership requires collaboration. A pastor who is a good leader has to make presentations for various projects to the church board, staff, and other key leaders to seek their approval.
But a pastor who is a dictator bypasses that collaboration and makes major decisions unilaterally … and then expects key leaders to support him fully.
*Leadership requires ownership. In my last church, we built a new worship center, a project that eventually cost about two million dollars. The building team worked on the plans. The church board handled the financing. The staff gave their input at every turn. We asked the architect to stand before our congregation and present his plans … allowed people to ask questions … and then held a meeting where people shared their input. We later listed every word people said on the church website which let everyone know we took congregational input seriously.
We needed broad ownership in decision making so that we could have broad ownership when we asked people to give toward the building.
But a pastor-dictator will bypass as many of those steps as possible. He and a few of his buddies inside the church will do most of the work … and then expect people to buy in with their finances … and things usually won’t go very well.
*Leadership requires patience. I once heard a prominent pastor say that it takes four years to make a major change in a church. A good leader will devise a process where he charts a clear course … people’s complaints are heard … their objections are answered … and change is not rushed.
But a pastor-dictator is always in a hurry. He doesn’t want to give the complainers any kind of forum because they might waylay his plans. He doesn’t want to devote any time to answering objections because he’s thought things through and that should be good enough for everyone else. The dictator thinks it’s his church far more than it’s the people’s church.
*Leadership requires love. I once knew a pastor who took a ministry class in seminary. The professor told his students you have to “love the sheep” and then “lead the sheep.” My friend approached the professor after class and said, “That was really great … you have to lead the sheep then love the sheep.” The professor said, “No, you have to love the sheep and then lead the sheep.” Big difference!
The pastor who is a true leader loves his people and then leads them. He motivates them by recommending ministries that are in their best interests.
But the dictator doesn’t even lead his people. He manipulates the congregation into doing what are in his own best interests. He bulldozes them … threatens them … and sends out the signals, “I alone know what is good for this church.”
To quote Paul Simon, such an attitude “sure don’t feel like love.”
*Leadership requires humility. The leader’s attitude is, “I believe this is the direction God wants us to go as a church. I’ll need your help along the way.”
But the dictator equates his own wishes, words, and plans with the will of God … and to question him is to doubt the Lord Himself.
If you’ve read my words …
What can you do about a pastor who is a dictator?
First, realize that most pastors who have adopted a dictatorial leadership style are rarely going to change.
Such pastors have enjoyed at least some success with their style which is why they keep using it. But whether it’s a personality flaw, or a narcissistic bent, or a defense mechanism, most dictators never change.
You can plead with them to become more collaborative … threaten to leave the church … or send them for counseling … but it won’t do any good.
I have never known a dictatorial pastor to alter his modus operandi. Have you?
Now if a pastor has exercised a collaborative style, and temporarily becomes dictatorial, that’s different. Sometimes a pastor senses that unless he pushes a project hard, nothing’s going to happen. I had to do that at times, but if people called me on it, I backed off and tried to reset matters.
In this article, I’m talking about pastors who have demonstrated unilateral dominance from Day One.
Second, realize that dictators will keep going until someone tries to stop them.
Once a dictator has momentum, that person will continue to use their domineering style because they’re getting results.
And if nobody ever calls them on their tactics, they’ll just keep using them.
The only way to stop a dictator is to stage some kind of an intervention. Let them know that what they are doing is counterproductive to the leadership and the congregation.
Much of the time, church leaders will tell me, “He’s a dictator, but boy, is he a great Bible teacher! He really knows the Word! Our people love his teaching!”
But sometimes, good teachers make lousy leaders. Many Bible teachers would rather spend all their time researching, writing, and delivering messages than doing anything to improve their leadership skills.
If so, let the pastor teach … and get someone else on board to lead the church.
Third, realize that dictators sow the seeds of their own destruction.
Once you’ve woken up to the fact that your pastor is a dictator, know that a Day of Reckoning is bound to occur … and maybe soon. Godly, gifted, intelligent people rebel inwardly against dictator-pastors … and if they conclude that things won’t change, they’ll quietly head for the exits.
Here is what will happen:
*your best leaders will leave the church first
*key ministries will be curtailed due to a lack of volunteers
*staff members will be laid off due to lack of funds
*those remaining will be the passive takers, not the active givers
*the dictator-pastor will then jump ship as soon as he can
This may not sound kind, but it’s better to take out the dictator before the death spiral occurs than to do nothing and watch your church slowly die.
Finally, the only way to deal with a dictator is to defeat them.
That means you’re going to have to fight them for control of the church.
And if you do engage them, I guarantee it’s going to get nasty … and bloody … and people are going to get hurt … including you and your family.
For this reason, if you’re in a church with a dictator as pastor, it’s preferable that you and your family quietly look for another church.
But if you’re determined to stay, you’re going to have to deal with your pastor … and there are ways to do this that are consistent with Scripture and the Christian faith.
If I was a board member, and I felt that the pastor had to go to save the church, I’d take the following steps:
*Call a special meeting of the official board away from the church campus.
*Express your concern about the way the pastor has been operating. Share real-life examples.
*Go around the room and let each board member share how they feel about the pastor. If the pastor has strong support, and you can’t convince them of your position, mentally make plans to leave the church. YOU CAN’T DEAL WITH A DICTATORIAL PASTOR UNLESS YOU HAVE FULL BOARD SUPPORT. If you do have full board support, then:
*Take time to pray and read Scripture together. Ask God for His guidance … and for courage. Confronting a dictatorial pastor will be among the hardest things you will ever do.
*Consult your church’s governing documents. Hopefully there’s a section that lays out how to hire and fire a pastor. If not, obtain the governing documents from three other churches that are governed like yours and summarize their process in a few steps. Then write out what you believe are the best practices for terminating a pastor and adopt them as a board.
*Do not make a laundry list of all the pastor’s shortcomings. That’s destructive. Instead, focus on the one or two areas that concern you the most … no more than two. (People can’t change in multiple areas of their lives.) Come up with several examples under each area of concern. You’re going to share these concerns with the pastor.
For example: “Pastor, whenever we ask you to give a report of your activities at the monthly board meeting, you just say, ‘Everything’s fine.’ But we need much more information than that! We’d like you to bring a one or two page written report to every board meeting so we know specifically what you are doing.”
That’s a reasonable request. (I brought a written report for years to every board meeting.) But the dictator usually resists such accountability.
*Prayerfully ask two people to meet with the pastor to express the board’s concerns. If possible, the chairman should be one of those people. (Otherwise, the pastor will wonder, “Does the chairman know about and agree with this confrontation?”)
*Ask the pastor to meet the two board members at a neutral location, like a restaurant, rather than in the pastor’s study or someone’s home. While you want privacy, it’s harder to make a scene in public.
*Give the pastor a choice. Tell him, “We love you and we’re happy for you to remain our pastor, but we need to see the following changes in your life and ministry or else we will take further action.” Then share with him how you want him to behave in the future. If he becomes angry, wait until he calms down. If he storms off, you’ll have to meet with him again. Tell him that if he leaves the meeting and contacts his supporters, you will recommend to the board that he be dismissed immediately.
*The pastor has four options at this point:
First, he can act like you’ve never met and continue operating as usual.
Second, he can contact his supporters, tell them about the meeting, and thereby institute an all-our war within your congregation. YOU NEED TO BE PREPARED FOR THIS POSSIBILITY.
Third, he can agree to make the changes you’ve suggested … in which case the board has the right to monitor his progress.
Finally, he may outwardly comply with the board’s wishes while starting to search for a new job.
I can’t give you a flow chart for what might happen under each option, but these kinds of situations can become unpredictable fast!
Let me share with you the single best way of dealing with a dictator-pastor.
Don’t hire one in the first place.
Share this:
Like this:
Read Full Post »