In the minds of many people, two words rarely go together.
Pastors … and sin.
Since pastors preach against sin, some people come to believe that their pastor is sinless … or at least nearly so.
But when you hang around groups of pastors, as I have for years, you discover that pastors are sinners, too.
They’re just better at hiding their sins than most people.
If you had to guess one sin that pastors commit more than any other, which one would you choose?
Greed?
Sloth?
Wrath?
Lust?
Envy?
Gluttony?
The six words I just mentioned constitute six of the seven deadly sins. Like all humans, pastors are susceptible to any and all of these shortcomings.
But I left one sin out.
In his classic work Mere Christianity, C. S. Lewis devoted an entire chapter to this sin. In fact, he called it “The Great Sin.”
Know what it is?
It’s pride.
Lewis said that pride is the complete anti-God state of mind. Pride is preoccupation with yourself, the belief that you are superior to other people … even when there’s no basis for it.
We all struggle with this issue – even pastors.
Let me share with you three ways that pastors display pride … sometimes unknowingly. I’ll share two more ways next time.
And I include myself in everything that I write.
First, pastors love to hear themselves talk.
I guess most people do … but more than in most professions, pastors are paid to talk.
We expect pastors to preach from the pulpit. What we don’t expect is for pastors to preach in private settings.
So try this experiment: if you ever find yourself in a social setting with a pastor, notice what happens.
Regardless of who holds the floor initially, see if the pastor eventually holds court … and if he determines the topic for discussion.
Winston Churchill once volunteered his idea of a good dinner: “to discuss a good topic – with myself as chief conversationalist.”
That’s true of pastors, too … although they could probably learn more by listening.
Why are pastors like this? I’m not sure. In my own case, I’m not very good at small talk, so if I can steer a conversation around to a larger issue, I’m more comfortable joining in … and that may be true of other pastors, too.
Second, pastors are competitive with their peers.
The day Magic Johnson announced he had AIDS, I was invited to meet with a group of pastors for some strategy sessions at a mountain cabin. (There were 15 or so of us there.)
Someone asked the pastors to go around the room and share how their Easter services had gone. Let me offer a typical response:
“Well, we had 757 people out for Easter this year, which was one-third more than we had last year. God’s Spirit is really moving at our church. I sense that we’re ready for a breakthrough. Since I came to the church two years ago, our attendance and giving have doubled, and we’re reaching our community for Christ like never before.”
By the way, all the pastors answered the question in a similar fashion. Easter went great … we’re really growing … I’m on top of the world … God is blessing. (In some cases, I knew better.)
All except for me. Nobody asked me how Easter went at our church … and nobody noticed that nobody asked me. It was just as well.
I couldn’t compete with the big boys.
When pastors get together in larger groups, there’s a pecking order. It’s determined by who dresses the best, or who has the most commanding presence, or who has seniority, or who has the largest church. Pastors are never completely honest when they’re in a larger group of their peers. They have a way of displaying their feathers.
Put them with a group of Christian psychologists, and their responses would be completely different.
Or if you placed one pastor in a group with two other pastors, they’d be much more honest … and that pecking order all but disappears.
Pastors aren’t nearly as competitive when they’re with doctors or attorneys or professional athletes. In fact, pastors tend to be deferential toward people in those professions.
But when they’re with their peers, the competitive juices start flowing. This is why I once heard J. I Packer say that pastors are a lot like manure. When they’re all spread out, they do a lot of good, but when they get together, it’s just one big stink.
Third, pastors have a need to be know-it-alls.
Pastors have a high need to be right. They love to straighten people out.
I suppose it comes from their training. When I was in seminary, we had to define and memorize specific biblical and theological terms … and Greek verb tenses … and dates in church history … and the beliefs of various world religions and cults … and what the Bible said about a host of social issues.
In most cases, my professors were absolutely convinced that their views were right and everybody else’s views … even those of fellow faculty members … were wrong. It was the job of the professors (who held the right views) to correct the students (who held the wrong views). So when we students were called to various churches, we modeled the attitudes of our professors.
We held the right views, while others held the wrong views.
It’s easy to absorb that attitude when you hang around a seminary for five years, as I did … which is why some Christian experts believe that a pastor’s most effective years begin only after he starts unlearning all the stuff he learned in seminary.
This need to be right is like a reflex action among pastors. Some learn how to disagree with others graciously, while others run around trying to straighten out everybody with whom they disagree.
I believe that pastors continue to struggle with pride until they suffer greatly or are deeply wounded with their own unique “thorn in the flesh.”
I’ll write more about this theme next time.
Your thoughts?
Blaming Others for My Mistakes
Posted in Church Conflict, Church Health and Conflict, Conflict with Church Antagonists, Please Comment!, tagged 1 John 1:8; 1 John 1:10, raising responsible kids, sociopaths in church on June 4, 2012| 4 Comments »
Most mornings, while working out on my treadmill, I run to classic rock while watching ESPN.
This morning, I saw highlights from last night’s Celtics-Heat playoff game.
Paul Pierce of the Celtics bulldozed over another player during overtime and was called for a foul … and fouled out of the game.
But did he do it? According to Pierce’s body language, he did NOTHING wrong and shouldn’t have been called for any foul.
Then LeBron James backed into a defender on the other side of the court and both of them fell down. When James was called for the foul – and he too fouled out – he couldn’t believe it.
It was the defender’s fault … or the ref’s fault … or the fault of Boston Garden (which seems to make “homers” out of refs) … or the fault of those little green leprechauns that inhabit the Garden.
But LeBron James’ fault? No way.
There was a show on TV when I was a kid called Romper Room. Believe it or not, I had the show’s theme song on record. The chorus went like this:
I always do what’s right
I never do anything wrong
I’m a Romper Room do bee
A do bee all day long
Seems to me the first two lines of that song perfectly encapsulate the attitudes of millions of people in our country … especially the second line: “I never do anything wrong.”
A Christian counselor friend of mine once told me that we’re raising a generation of sociopaths. The latest estimates are that 4% of the population has anti-social personality disorder (the new term for sociopathy), characterized by a complete lack of conscience.
As Dr. Archibald Hart told me after class one day, the sociopath feels no anxiety before doing wrong and feels no guilt afterward. This person lacks a moral core. While the sociopath can be outwardly charming, he or she is inwardly manipulative.
And what does this person want more than anything else in life?
To win.
The sociopath will do anything to win.
They choose targets … people who threaten them or who they think are weak … and then bully them or abuse them or lie to them just to watch them squirm.
You’ll find these people running countries … and supervising employees at work … and in families … and in politics … and even in your neighborhood. (Dr. Martha Stout’s excellent book The Sociopath Next Door asks this question on its cover: Who is the devil you know?)
Although a layman cannot properly diagnose someone as a sociopath – it takes a well-trained psychologist to do so – we can at least suspect someone of having the condition if they demonstrate certain symptoms.
The reason I bring this up is that the last place we’d expect to find a sociopath is in a Christian church. After all, isn’t the confession of sin a requirement for both conversion and spiritual growth?
As 1 John 1:8 puts it, “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” Verse 10 goes on to say, “If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives.”
And yet sociopaths slip into church leadership … and onto church staffs … and behind church pulpits … fooling EVERYBODY along the way.
I’ve worked with a handful of church leaders that I suspected fit this description.
They were charismatic individuals.
They ignored authority.
They made the same mistakes over and over again … and didn’t learn anything from them. (One leader kept getting traffic tickets, and instead of changing his behavior, he’d fight the tickets in court … and win.)
They put on a facade of charm for their adoring public … while engaging in sabotage behind the scenes. (Whenever I had to correct their behavior, they would tell their fans, who would become upset with me.)
But what I’m most concerned about isn’t the presence of sociopaths in churches.
I’m most concerned about the fact that we’re raising sociopaths in Christian homes.
Let me give you an example.
Imagine that you have a daughter named Jane, who is in the fourth grade.
One day, Jane’s teacher calls you at work and tells you that Jane’s grades are poor and that she’s been misbehaving in class. The teacher wants to meet with you … right away.
So you meet with Jane’s teacher, who shows you copies of Jane’s incomplete and poorly done assignments … and shows you indisputable proof via surveillance that Jane’s behavior in class is out of control.
Once upon a time, you and Jane’s teacher would collaborate together and come up with a plan for dealing with Jane’s behavior. Call it a PTA … a parent teacher alliance. With a strong alliance between school and home, Jane would be forced to change her behavior.
But what happens in our day? You become incensed because Jane’s teacher doesn’t view your daughter as being perfect … so you blame Jane’s teacher for Jane’s misbehavior … as well as the school … and the curriculum … and Jane’s classmates … as well as President Bush. (Can you believe that some people are still blaming him for problems in our country, even though he hasn’t been president for almost four years?)
Instead of forming a PTA, you have just formed a PCA (parent-child alliance) with your daughter and against her teacher … and by extension, every other authority that will come into her life.
And what will happen to Jane? She may grow intellectually … and vocationally … but she won’t be able to grow emotionally or spiritually.
Why not?
Because you, as her parent, will not let her learn from her mistakes.
Could this be a reason why so many college graduates are living at home with their parents? Just asking.
I’ll have more to say on this matter next time …
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this matter.
Share this:
Read Full Post »